izdey
yknow you open up a arch. magazine and all you see are lumps and lumps of mashups of the works done in other issues. and i say this knowing that luxury's bounded by the most obtainable expensive unit, like a floor tile, rather than other antiquities, for instance, an unfinished brickwall that frames that chandelier. you would realize that more and often, in a designer made perspectives shots, the best thing you could come up with are low E glass and wall mounted plasma tvs. ceilings have nothing on but profile cuts of plaster boards with recessed ceiling lights. it's as if that high ass ceiling had anything to do with the queen sized, double drapped bed in the first place. if ever so, it's more disappointing to see how L-shaped sofa sets are designed subconsciously to accentuate the angles of that square room. is there no reference to personal taste of the client? or has all this language of our nation's 'luxury' backfired, revealing how selfless we really are.
yknow you open up a arch. magazine and all you see are lumps and lumps of mashups of the works done in other issues. and i say this knowing that luxury's bounded by the most obtainable expensive unit, like a floor tile, rather than other antiquities, for instance, an unfinished brickwall that frames that chandelier. you would realize that more and often, in a designer made perspectives shots, the best thing you could come up with are low E glass and wall mounted plasma tvs. ceilings have nothing on but profile cuts of plaster boards with recessed ceiling lights. it's as if that high ass ceiling had anything to do with the queen sized, double drapped bed in the first place. if ever so, it's more disappointing to see how L-shaped sofa sets are designed subconsciously to accentuate the angles of that square room. is there no reference to personal taste of the client? or has all this language of our nation's 'luxury' backfired, revealing how selfless we really are.
